Efficiency Indicators
A detailed look at each efficiency indicator: what it measures, how the analysis works, and what actions you can take.
The Snowflake Efficiency Score evaluates four distinct areas of warehouse and compute efficiency. Each indicator maps to a specific optimization opportunity within Seemore.
Warehouse Idle Time
Lookback window: 21 days Related feature: Auto-Shutdown
What It Measures
Warehouse Idle Time tracks periods when a warehouse is running (consuming credits) but no queries are being executed. This is one of the most common sources of unnecessary Snowflake spend.
How the Analysis Works
The app queries
ACCOUNT_USAGE.WAREHOUSE_EVENTS_HISTORYto identify warehouse start/stop events and query execution windows.It calculates the gap between the end of one query and the start of the next for each warehouse.
Credits consumed during these idle gaps are aggregated and compared to total credits consumed.
What You Can Do
Enable Auto-Shutdown in Seemore to automatically suspend warehouses the moment they become idle, without interrupting active queries.
Review the per-warehouse breakdown in the results table to identify which warehouses have the highest idle cost.
Multi-Cluster Idle Time
Lookback window: 7 days Related feature: Auto-Scaler Requires: Snowflake Enterprise edition or higher
What It Measures
For warehouses configured with multi-cluster scaling, this indicator measures idle time on non-primary clusters — additional clusters that were scaled up but had no workload to process.
How the Analysis Works
The app queries
ACCOUNT_USAGE.WAREHOUSE_EVENTS_HISTORYfiltered to non-primary clusters (cluster number > 1).It identifies periods where additional clusters were running but not serving queries.
The idle cost is calculated based on credits consumed by those clusters during idle periods.
What You Can Do
Review your multi-cluster scaling policies — consider tighter scaling thresholds or shorter scale-down windows.
Use Seemore's Auto-Scaler recommendations to optimize when additional clusters spin up and down.
Note: If your account uses Standard edition, this indicator is skipped and the overall score is calculated from the remaining three indicators.
Warehouse Sizing Efficiency
Lookback window: 7 days Related feature: Smart Pulse
What It Measures
Sizing Efficiency evaluates whether each warehouse is appropriately sized for its workload. An oversized warehouse wastes credits per query; an undersized one leads to longer execution times and queue delays.
How the Analysis Works
The app queries
ACCOUNT_USAGE.QUERY_HISTORYto retrieve execution times and warehouse sizes for recent queries.It simulates how queries would perform at one size smaller and one size larger.
A sizing efficiency percentage is computed based on how many warehouses are at or near their optimal size.
What You Can Do
Review the sizing recommendations in the results table to see which warehouses are candidates for resizing.
Enable Smart Pulse in Seemore to automatically adjust warehouse sizes based on workload patterns throughout the day.
Clustering Column Efficiency
Lookback window: 7 days Related feature: Auto-Clustering Agent
What It Measures
Clustering Column Efficiency evaluates how effectively your tables' clustering keys are configured. Poor clustering leads to excessive partition scanning, increasing query cost and execution time. Unnecessary auto-clustering incurs maintenance costs without meaningful performance gains.
How the Analysis Works
The app queries
ACCOUNT_USAGE.AUTOMATIC_CLUSTERING_HISTORYto identify tables with active auto-clustering and their associated costs.It queries
ACCOUNT_USAGE.TABLE_PRUNING_HISTORYto measure partition pruning effectiveness — the ratio of partitions scanned versus partitions pruned.Tables with low pruning ratios or high clustering costs relative to benefit are flagged.
What You Can Do
Review the per-table clustering analysis to identify tables where clustering keys should be changed, added, or removed.
Use Seemore's Auto-Clustering Agent to get AI-driven recommendations for optimal clustering key selection, including cost-benefit analysis for each table.
Last updated
